#Hima Kohli

[rightnewshindi]

एक सितंबर की सेवानिवृत हो रही जस्टिस हिमा कोहली, चीफ जस्टिस ने महिला अधिकारों को लेकर की तारीफ

Delhi News: चीफ जस्टिस डीवाइ चंद्रचूड़ ने सेवानिवृत्त हो रही वरिष्ठ महिला जज की प्रशंसा करते हुए कहा कि जस्टिस हिमा कोहली महिलाओं के अधिकार की हिमायती रही हैं और हमेशा इसके लिए वह सजग रही हैं। जस्टिस हिमा कोहली एक सितंबर को रिटायर हो रही हैं और उनके कार्यकाल का शुक्रवार को आखिरी कार्य दिवस था और इस मौके पर वह चीफ जस्टिस के साथ बेंच में बैठीं। जस्टिस हिमा कोहली शुक्रवार को चीफ जस्टिस चंद्रचूड़…

[uniqueeval]

Supreme Court protects jobs of government employees whose castes, tribes were de-scheduled

The Supreme Court of India. File | Photo Credit: The Hindu The Supreme Court on Thursday (August 29, 2024) protected the jobs of government and bank staffers who got employment on Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe certificates, but whose castes and tribes were later de-scheduled. The judgment by a Bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta concerned employees of Canara Bank, Oriental Insurance…

[niharranjannayak]

Supreme Court of India: Bail for first-time offenders applies retrospectively on Section 479 BNSS

🌐 https://niharranjannayak.in

Supreme Court of India bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta while hearing a #PIL regarding overcrowding of prisons in the country. The Centre on Friday informed the Supreme Court that Section 479 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which allows courts to #grant_bail to  #first_time_offenders who have undergone #detention for a third of the maximum period prescribed, would apply with retrospective effect. Section 479 of the BNSS (which replaced CrPC) has said that if first-time offenders have remained in jail for one-third of the maximum sentence, they can be released on bail. This means the provision will apply to all undertrials in cases registered before July 1, 2024. Section 479 of the #BNSS provides for the release of undertrials who have been behind bars for many years with no end in sight for trial. However, the said section does not extend the benefit to those who are accused of an offence for which the prescribed punishment is death or life imprisonment.

[bhaskarlive]

SC closes contempt proceedings against Ramdev & Balkrishna, accepts apology

The Supreme Court on Tuesday discharged the contempt notice issued to Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved’s Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna over the continued publication of misleading advertisements by the company.

Earlier on May 14, dispensing Ramdev and Balkrishna’s personal appearance in further hearings, a bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah reserved its verdict in the contempt proceedings.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[seemabhatnagar]

"Legal Milestone: Apex Court transfers conjugal Rights case, forbids caste mention"

Shama Sharma v. Kishan Kumar

Transfer Petition 1957/2023

Before Supreme Court of India

Transfer petition was allowed by the Bench comprising Hon’ble Madam Justice Hima Kohli J & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah J

Fact

A

Transfer petition is filed by the wife in the application filed by the husband before the Family Court Sriganganagar, Rajasthan for Restitution of Conjugal Rights to a court of competent jurisdiction at Faridkot, Punjab.

The Apex Court observed that none appeared for the Respondent husband on 29.11.2023 despite service of notice by the court and personal intimation by speed post as well as on whatsapp by the wife. Te husband didn’t appear on 19.01.2024,

In view of the same Apex Court allowed the Transfer Petition preferred by the wife to the court of competent jurisdiction at Faridkot Punjab.

Apex Court granted liberty is granted to the respondent-husband to move an appropriate application before the transferee Court for permission to participate in the proceedings virtually.

Transferee Court was directed that if such a request is made, the transferee Court may grant such permission and direct the personal presence of the respondent-husband only when it is absolutely necessary.

Further, if examination of outstation witnesses is required and a request is made for recording the evidence through a Court Commissioner, the transferee Court shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders.

B

Apex Court was astonished to see that the caste of both the parties has been mentioned in the memo of parties, besides their other details.

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that if the memo of parties as filed before the courts below is changed in any manner, the Registry raises an objection and in the present case as the caste of both the parties was mentioned before the court below, he had no option but to mention their caste in the Transfer Petition.

Apex Court didn’t find any reason for mentioning the caste/religion of any litigant either before this Court or the courts below. Such a practice is to be shunned and must be ceased forthwith.

General Order was passed by the Apex Court henceforth the caste or religion of parties shall not be mentioned in the memo of parties of a petition/proceeding filed before this Court, irrespective of whether any such details have been furnished before the courts below.

A direction was also issued to all the High Courts to ensure that the caste/religion of a litigant does not appear in the memo of parties in any petition/suit/proceeding filed before the High Court or the Subordinate Courts under their respective jurisdictions.

The Apex Court also directed that its directions shall be brought to the notice of the members of the Bar as well as the Registry for immediate compliance.

Seema Bhatnagar

[steadycollectivedelusion]

Same-sex judgment compels queer Indians to remain in closet: Review petition in Supreme Court

A review petition was filed before the Supreme Court on Wednesday challenging the correctness of the apex court’s verdict that refused to recognize the right of same-sex couples to enter into marriages or have civil unions. A Constitution Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha had on October 17 ruled…

[legalupanishad]

Supreme Court Denies Legalizing: Same-Sex Marriages

This article on 'Supreme Court Denies Legalizing Same-Sex Marriages in a 3:2 Verdict' was written by Ishika Agarwal, an intern at Legal Upanishad.

Introduction

Since ancient times, marriage has been regarded as a sacred thread creating a bond between two people, and this bond not only connects two souls but also two families. In the past, marriage was only possible between a man and a woman. The concept of same-sex marriage or gay marriage did not exist at that time. Those who solemnized their marriage and lived together got legal and social recognition. Both statutory and personal laws have recognized heterosexual marriage, i.e., marriage between the opposite gender. However, marriage between people of the same sex was not recognized until recent times. There are only a few countries around the world that have given legal recognition to same-sex marriages. India has not accepted or granted legal recognition to same-sex marriage. In this article, we will discuss the recent decision of the Supreme Court regarding same-sex marriages in India.

Background of the case

There was a total of 21 petitions filed by various same-sex couples, LGBTQIA+ activists, and transgender persons. These petitions took issue with the Special Marriage Act 1954, the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, and the Foreign Marriage Act 1969. These petitions were transferred to the Constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on January 6, 2023. The petitioners, who are supported by prominent lawyers such as Mukul Rohatgi, Abhishek, Manu Singhvi, Raju Ramachandran, Anand Grover, Geeta Luthra, K V Viswanathan, Saurabh Kirpal, and Menaka Guruswamy have highlighted the rights of LGBTQIA+ individuals and urged the court to recognize such a union, which would enable them to lead a life of dignity comparable to that of heterosexual couples. They also urged that same-sex marriage should be given legal recognition under the Special Marriage Act so that they can avail the other benefits. The Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta, representing the Union of India, argued that a total of 160 laws would be affected if marriage equality was granted and further added that it is the Parliament that can make, amend, or repeal the laws and Courts have not been conferred with such powers. Contact Us and avail the best assignment help for students available online! Further, the Union Government indicated its willingness to set up a committee to determine whether certain privileges can be bestowed upon same-sex and queer couples without formally recognizing their relationship as a form of marriage. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing Madhya Pradesh State, opposed the petition along with senior advocate Kapil Sibal and senior advocate Arvind Datar.  The high-profile case was heard by a panel of five judges of the Supreme Court of India, including Chief Justice of the Union of India DY Chandrachud, comprising Justices SK Kaul and S Ravindran Bhat. The other members of the panel were Justices Hima Kohli and P. S. Narasimha.

Other countries' views on same-sex marriage

According to the Human Rights Campaign, a US-based LGBTQ advocacy group, 32 countries have recognized gay marriage. This marriage is recognized by court rulings only in 10 countries. These countries include the US, Australia, Ireland, Switzerland, South Africa, Taiwan, Argentina, and Canada. In the year 2019, Taiwan became the first country in Asia to legalize gay marriage. Most other countries around the world have already passed laws to allow same-sex couples to get married.

Judgement of the Supreme Court

On Tuesday, i.e., October 17, 2023, the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court pronounced four judgements that were written by CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice SK Kaul, Justice Ravindra Bhat, and Justice PS Narasimha, respectively. CJI DY Chandrachud and Justice SK Kaul agreed, while Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli, and Justice PS Narasimha agreed on the same opinion.

Judgement of CJI DY Chandrachud

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) ruled that the Court of Justice is not able to invalidate the Special Marriage Act (SMA) as the Parliament and State Legislature have the exclusive power to do so, leaving the decision-making to them. The Court further asserted that any invalidity of the SMA would result in the loss of the advantages of progressive legislation. Furthermore, he said that the guidelines of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA), a government agency under the Ministry of Women and Child Development, discriminate against atypical, unmarried couples adopting a child, thus violating Article 15 of the Constitution, and held that unmarried couples, including queer couples, can jointly adopt a child. He was in favour of the recommendation made by the Union government to constitute a committee to determine the rights and entitlements of queer couples.

Judgement of Justice SK Kaul

Judge Kaul concurred with the view of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) that civil unions for same-sex couples should be recognised by law and that this is an important step towards achieving marriage equality.

Judgement of Justice Ravindra Bhat

He disagreed with the judgement of CJI DY Chandrachud and said that civil unions can only be granted via enacted laws. However, he also favoured the recommendation made by the Union Government. He further added that the present case is very different from previous cases in the way that previous cases were related to the protection of citizens’ rights from violence or harm caused to them by the state. He submitted that the right to marry is not a fundamental right. Justice Bhat stated that the Court does not have the power to constitute a legal framework in this regard, as there are several grounds that need to be taken into consideration, and it is only the legislature that can do so.

Judgement of Justice PS Narasimha

Consenting with Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice PS Narasimha said that the right to marry is a statutory right and not a constitutional right. He further agreed with Justice Ravindra Bhat with respect to the CARA regulations and said that unmarried couples, including queer couples, do not have the right to adopt, and these regulations could not be declared unconstitutional. With respect to schemes of gratuity, pensions, insurance, etc. that are not applicable to queer couples, legislative policies in that respect should be taken into consideration.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court refused to give constitutional validity to same-sex marriages by a 3:2 majority and also held civil unions unconstitutional. The Supreme Court accepted the recommendation of the Union Government, as stated by the Solicitor General of India, to constitute a high-powered committee to examine the rights, entitlements, and other concerns related to same-sex couples but refused to validate the adoption by unmarried couples and queer couples.

Reference

'Same-Sex Marriage Verdict: SC refuses to give marriage equality rights to LGBTQIA+ community in India', LiveMint, 17 October 2023, Available at: https://www.livemint.com/news/samesex-marriage-verdict-live-updates-supreme-court-verdict-lgbtqia-special-marriage-act-cji-chandrachud-11697505822651.html Padmakshi Sharma, Supreme Court To Pronounce Judgement In Same-Sex Marriage Case Tomorrow, LiveLaw, 16 October 2023, available at: https://www.livelaw.in/amp/top-stories/supreme-court-to-pronounce-judgement-in-same-sex-marriage-case-tomorrow-240282 'Same-sex marriage: Key points from Supreme Court verdict', Times of India, 17 October 2023, available at: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/same-sex-marriage-key-points-from-supreme-court-verdict/articleshow/104486756.cms?from=mdr Read the full article

[tadktabhadkta]

Supreme Court rules 5-0 against same-sex marriage, 3-2 against adoption

Supreme Courts Rules  :

In a blow to the campaign for the equal treatment of people of alternative sexual orientation, the Supreme Court on Tuesday denied the request to legalize same-sex marriages and grant queer couples the right to adopt.

Supreme Court Despite insisting that being queer is neither urban nor elite, the Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices SK Kaul, SR Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narasimha bench's unanimous decision that the right to marry was not a fundamental right and that the legislature had the authority to regulate it in accordance with societal circumstances disappointed the hopeful faces in the courtroom. In a clear statement that the only way to change marriage laws and other related laws to grant same-sex couples the right to wed legally, the bench said it was not up to the court to read down or add language to Section 4 of the Special Marriage Act (SMA) of 1954 that would eliminate the statutorily required man-woman component of marriage. The judges also concurred that a powerful committee, to be established by the government, should look into all matters pertaining to the queer community and weigh their advantages. But there was no more agreement. The overwhelming ruling was against same-sex couples being able to adopt, despite the CJI and Justice Kaul's views to the contrary. An emotional roller coaster in apex court As Chief Justice DY Chandrachud announced on Tuesday that same-sex couples could adopt children, it was an emotional roller coaster. Justice SK Kaul agreed. Following the Supreme Court's denial of same-sex marriage, the LGBTQIA+ community, which included 21 petitioners and other intervenors last year, briefly had some hope for consoling relief. But as the forthright judgments of Justices SR Bhat and Hima Kohli, with whom Justice PR Narasimha agreed, rejecting the adoption rights to same-sex couples, the opinions of the Chief Justice and Justice Kaul became the minority view, their aspirations were dashed. Important passages from each justice's decision were read aloud in front of the court for 45 minutes total. The judges had different opinions on the matter of same-sex couples entering into civil unions that would provide them marriage-like rights, despite the fact that the bench had unanimously determined that the right to marry was not a basic right. In his 247-page ruling, CJI Chandrachud stated that homosexuality is a natural occurrence that has been known to India since ancient times. It is not elite or urban. He did, however, acknowledge that in order to "democratise personal relationships," the state had to legislate marriage. "A basic right to marriage is not explicitly recognized by the Constitution. Based solely on the meaning ascribed to it by law, an institution cannot be elevated to the status of a basic right. Due to institutional constraints, this court cannot invalidate the SMA's constitutionality or add new provisions to it. This court cannot insert words into the SMA's and other related statutes' provisions because doing so would be judicial legislation. In exercising its judicial review authority, the court must stay away from matters that pertain to legislation, especially those that have an impact on policy, he said. A transgender man, according to the CJI and Justice Kaul, could lawfully wed a transgender woman under the SMA. This opinion was agreed to by other three judges. The Chief Justice of India declared, "A person's gender is not the same as their sexuality. A person's gender identification determines whether they are transgender or not. The laws governing marriage would recognize a marriage if a transgender person was in a heterosexual relationship and desired to wed their partner (and if each of them met the other qualifications outlined in the applicable law). This is so that in the marriage, one party would serve as the bride, or the wife, while the other would serve as the bridegroom, or the husband. Justices Bhat and Kohli concurred with the Chief Justice in saying that "there cannot be a per se assertion that there exists an unqualified right to marry which requires treatment as a fundamental freedom." They dissented from the CJI's position, arguing that same-sex couples do not require the designation of civil unions in order to confer the rights that come with being in a marriage-like relationship. Therefore, we disagree with the Chief Justice of India who stated that the positive postulate of various rights leads to the conclusion that everyone has the right to enter into a union or a long-term cohabitation relationship, which the state is required to recognize "to give real meaning" to the right. Justices Bhat and Kohli agreed. Justice Narasimha shared their viewpoint. Justices Bhat and Kohli stated in reference to the Navtej Johar decision that decriminalized same-sex relationships: "Previous judgments of this court have established that queer and LGBTQ+ couples, too, have the right to union or relationship (under Article 21) - "be it mental, emotional or sexual," flowing from the right to privacy, right to choice, and autonomy. This does not, however, grant any claim to a legal standing for the aforementioned union or partnership. The legislature needed to address the question of how LGBT couples may obtain legal status for their relationships, according to Justice Bhat. "The state, in this case the legislature and the administration, needs to use its power in furtherance of the modalities of how it should play out, what it would involve, etc. Now, how this will play out on India's democratic stage—whether through purposeful state action or as a result of persistent citizen mobilization—can only be determined with time. ALSO READ THIS : IOC Session: PM Narendra Modi confirms India’s bid to host 2036 Olympics, says nation will leave ‘no stone unturned’ Read the full article

[blogynewsz]

Unlocking Love: Discover the Global Map of Same-Sex Marriage Freedom

The Supreme Court of India is set to announce its decision on the validity of same-sex marriage in the country. The judgment comes after a series of hearings by a five-judge constitution bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, along with Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narishma. These hearings lasted for a period of ten days, during which various pleas seeking…

[seobud]

Transforming Dreams into Reality: Sports Academies in India

Introduction

Sports have always been an integral part of India's cultural fabric, with a rich history of producing world-class athletes. In recent years, the country has witnessed a surge in the popularity of various sports, leading to a growing demand for professional training and development. To cater to this demand, sports academies in India have emerged as the nurturing grounds for budding athletes and aspirants seeking to excel in their chosen disciplines. This article delves into the diverse landscape of sports academies in India, highlighting their significance and impact on the nation's sporting prowess.

The Rise of Sports Academies

The past decade has witnessed a remarkable transformation in India's sporting ecosystem, marked by the rise of sports academies across the country. These academies have played a pivotal role in identifying and nurturing young talent, providing them with world-class facilities, coaching, and exposure to international competitions. This paradigm shift has not only elevated India's status on the global sports stage but has also instilled a sense of optimism and enthusiasm among the youth.

Cricket Academies

Cricket, often referred to as a religion in India, enjoys unparalleled popularity. Cricket academies have sprung up in every nook and corner of the country, training young talents to become the next cricketing sensations. Institutions like the National Cricket Academy (NCA) in Bangalore and the MRF Pace Foundation in Chennai have been instrumental in shaping the careers of renowned cricketers like Virat Kohli and Jasprit Bumrah.

Football Academies

With the Indian Super League (ISL) gaining prominence, football has witnessed a surge in popularity. Football academies such as the Tata Football Academy in Jamshedpur and the All India Football Federation's Elite Academy have been at the forefront of nurturing promising football talent. These academies provide comprehensive training programs, giving young players the opportunity to compete on both national and international platforms.

Badminton Academies

India has seen a resurgence in badminton, with players like P.V. Sindhu and Saina Nehwal achieving global recognition. Badminton academies like the Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy in Bangalore and the Pullela Gopichand Badminton Academy in Hyderabad have been instrumental in honing the skills of these world-class athletes.

Boxing Academies

Indian boxers have made a mark on the world stage, and boxing academies have played a crucial role in this success. The Bhiwani Boxing Club in Haryana and the Mary Kom Regional Boxing Foundation in Manipur have produced Olympic medalists and world champions, instilling a sense of pride and hope among aspiring pugilists.

Athletics Academies

Athletics has been an integral part of India's sporting tradition, and academies like the Sports Authority of India (SAI) and the PT Usha School of Athletics have been instrumental in identifying and nurturing track and field talent. The success of athletes like Neeraj Chopra and Hima Das is a testament to the quality training offered by these academies.

The Impact on Grassroots Sports

Sports academies have not only focused on producing elite athletes but have also made significant contributions to grassroots sports development. They conduct talent identification programs at the school and district levels, ensuring that young talents from diverse backgrounds get access to professional training. This has paved the way for a more inclusive and diverse sports culture in India.

Infrastructure and Facilities

One of the key factors contributing to the success of sports academies in India is the state-of-the-art infrastructure and world-class facilities they offer. These academies are equipped with modern training equipment, sports science laboratories, physiotherapy centers, and residential facilities for athletes. Such amenities help athletes train and compete at the highest level without any hindrance.

Coaching and Expertise

The caliber of coaching and expertise available at these academies is another crucial aspect that sets them apart. Many former Olympians, international coaches, and sports scientists are associated with these academies, providing athletes with invaluable guidance and mentorship. This not only helps athletes improve their skills but also instills a sense of discipline and commitment.

International Exposure

Sports academies in India recognize the importance of international exposure in an athlete's development. They often arrange overseas training camps, participation in international competitions, and interactions with foreign coaches and athletes. These experiences broaden an athlete's horizons and prepare them for the global stage.

Challenges and the Way Forward

While sports academies have made significant strides, there are challenges that need to be addressed to further elevate Indian sports. These include:

Funding: Many academies struggle with limited funding, hindering their ability to provide the best facilities and coaching.

Grassroots Development: Ensuring that talent is identified and nurtured at the grassroots level remains a challenge, particularly in rural areas.

Sports Science and Sports Medicine: Investing in sports science and sports medicine is crucial for athlete development, injury prevention, and rehabilitation.

Encouraging a Sports Culture: Fostering a sports culture from a young age is vital, and schools and educational institutions should play a more active role.

Inclusivity: Promoting inclusivity and diversity in sports, including gender equality, is essential for the growth of Indian sports.

Conclusion

Sports academies in India have ushered in a new era of optimism and excellence in Indian sports. They have transformed dreams into reality for countless athletes, providing them with the necessary resources and guidance to excel on the national and international stage. With continued support, investment, and a collective effort, these academies can help India achieve even greater heights in the world of sports. The journey from a cricket-loving nation to a multi-sport powerhouse is well underway, and sports academies are leading the way.

[blogynews]

"Increasing Waves of Diversity: The Groundbreaking Arrival of First-Generation Lawyers and the Transformative Rise of Women in the Legal Profession, Reveals Supreme Court Judge"

Supreme Court Judge Justice Hima Kohli praised the entry of first-generation lawyers from diverse backgrounds and the increasing representation of women in the legal profession, emphasizing that these developments promote inclusivity. Speaking at the Forbes India-Legal Power List 2022 finale, Justice Kohli acknowledged that the Indian legal profession has undergone significant demographic changes…

[blogynewz]

"Increasing Waves of Diversity: The Groundbreaking Arrival of First-Generation Lawyers and the Transformative Rise of Women in the Legal Profession, Reveals Supreme Court Judge"

Supreme Court Judge Justice Hima Kohli praised the entry of first-generation lawyers from diverse backgrounds and the increasing representation of women in the legal profession, emphasizing that these developments promote inclusivity. Speaking at the Forbes India-Legal Power List 2022 finale, Justice Kohli acknowledged that the Indian legal profession has undergone significant demographic changes…

[uniqueeval]

Apology over ‘damaging’ statements: SC says excerpt filed by IMA president illegible, font miniscule

IMA president RV. Asokan. FIle | Photo Credit: PTI The Supreme Court on Tuesday (August 27, 2024) said the Indian Medical Association (IMA) president R V Asokan’s unconditional apology published in a newspaper over his “damaging” statements in an interview to PTI was illegible and the font miniscule. A bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta directed senior advocate P S Patwalia,…

[demon-slayer-season3-episode7]

귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기

귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 풀버전 드립니다. 자막도 있으니깐 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 볼수 있습니다.

귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 보는곳 링크 <<

위에 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 방법 제시 했습니다.

뉴델리, 자그란 특파원. 목요일 대법원은 Satyendar Jain 전 델리 보건부 장관의 보석 요청을 청취하면서 집행국(ED)의 답변을 구했습니다. Satyendar Jain은 돈세탁 사건으로 지난 몇 달 동안 델리의 Tihar 감옥에 수감되었습니다.

Bopanna 판사와 Hima Kohli 판사는 ED에 통지를 보내는 동안 Jain에게 법원의 휴가 벤치에서 구제를 호소할 수 있는 자유를 부여했습니다. tyendar Jain과 같은 주장을 한 선임 옹호자 Abhishek Singhvi는 전 장관이 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 감옥에 있는 동안 35kg을 잃었고 해골로 축소되었다고 주장했습니다. 그는 또한 많은 질병으로 고통 받고 있습니다. ED에 참석한 추가 법무차관 SV Raju는 청원에 반대한다고 말했습니다. 이에 대해 법원은 다음 심리에 대한 명확한 날짜를 밝히지 않았으며 Jain이 구제를 위해 휴가 벤치에 항소할 수 있다고 말했습니다.

4월 6일, 델리 고등법원은 돈세탁 사건에서 Satyendar Jain이 영향력 있는 인물이며 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 증인에게 영향을 미칠 수 있다며 보석금을 기각했습니다.

Satyendar Jain에 대한 돈세탁 사건은 CBI가 제출한 FIR을 기반으로 2017년에 ED에 의해 등록되었습니다. 그는 CBI에 등록된 사건에서 2019년 9월 6일에 일반 보석금을 받았습니다.

2022년에 재판 법원은 Jain이 체포된 후 ED가 제출한 고소장을 인지했습니다. 이 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 고발장에는 Jain과 그의 아내 및 기타 8개 회사를 포함한 4개 회사가 자금 세탁 혐의로 기소되었습니다.

파트나/뉴델리, 에이전시. Nitish 정부는 Bihar의 카스트 기반 인구 조사와 관련하여 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 다시 좌절을 겪었습니다. 목요일 대법원은 비하르에서 카스트 기반 열거와 관련된 청원을 심리하면서 파트나 고등법원의 결정을 유지하기를 거부했습니다. 이에 앞서 Sanjay Karol 대법관은 수요일 비하르에서 카스트 기반 열거와 관련된 청원을 듣기를 기피했습니다. 이로 인해 청원을들을 수 없었습니다. 스트 기반 열거를 금지하는 Patna 고등 법원 명령은 Bihar 정부에 의해 대법원에서 이의를 제기했습니다. Karol 판사는 2023년 2월 6일에 대법관으로 승격되었습니다. 이제 목요일에 이 문제는 Abhay Oak 판사와 Rajesh Bindal 판사의 법정에서 심리될 것입니다. 그 전에는 Patna 고등 법원의 대법원장을 역임했습니다. 그는 이전에 고등 법원에서 심리한 일부 관련 사건의 당사자라고 말했습니다. 그런 다음 대법원의 관련 재판부는 청원서를 인도 대법원장 DY Chandrachud 앞에 나열하도록 지시하여 심리를 위한 적절한 재판부가 구성될 수 있도록 했습니다. BR Gavai 대법관도 이 벤치에 귀칼 3 기 7 화 포함되어 있습니다. 파트나 고등법원의 5월 4일 명령에 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 대해 대법원에 제출된 청원서에서 비하르 정부는 카스트 기반 열거 금지가 전체 행사에 부정적인 영향을 미칠 것이라고 말했습니다. 주 정부는 또한 카스트 기반 데이터 수집이 15조 및 16조에 따른 헌법상의 명령이라고 밝혔습니다. 헌법 제15조는 국가는 국민을 종교, 인종, 카스트, 성별, 출생지 또는 그 어떤 이유로도 차별하지 않는다고 명시하고 있다. 동시에 제16조는 모든 시민이 주 정부 산하의 모든 공직에 고용 또는 임명되는 것과 관련하여 동등한 기회를 제공해야 한다고 말합니다. Bihar 정부는 주가 일부 지역에서 카스트 인구 조사 작업의 80% 이상을 완료했다고 주장했습니다. 전체 시스템은 풀뿌리 수준에서 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 자막 작동합니다. 분쟁의 최종 결정에 도달할 때까지 이 연습을 수행해도 아무런 해가 없습니다.

뉴델리, 온라인 데스크. 타밀 나두에서 퐁갈의 날에 열리는 Jallikattu 게임에 관한 Jallikattu 대법원의 판결이 오늘 나왔습니다. 5명의 심판 벤치가 게임을 진행하도록 했습니다. 최고 법원은 타밀 나두 정부의 주장을 받아들여 황소에게 어떤 잔인한 행위도 가해지지 않는다고 말했습니다. 오늘 대법원의 판결에 모두의 시선이 쏠렸지만 황소 스포츠인 Jallikattu가 위험하다면 왜 경기를 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 치루고 전통적 신념과 규칙은 무엇인지 알아봅시다… Jallikattu는 타밀 나두의 고대 스포츠로 황소를 통제하기 위한 투쟁이 있습니다. 게임은 처음 세 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 마리의 황소를 풀어주는 것으로 시작됩니다. 이 황소는 마을에서 가장 나이가 많은 황소로 자부심을 갖고 있기 때문에 아무도 잡지 않습니다. 이 세 마리의 황소가 떠나면 메인 게임이 시작되고 나머지 황소는 뿔에 동전 주머니를 묶은 후 군중 속으로 풀려납니다. 이후 정해진 시간 안에 소뿔에서 동전 주머니를 꺼내는 사람이 승자라고 한다.

Jallikattu는 Tamil Nadu의 Pongal의 상서로운 축제에서 기념됩니다. 이 게임은 약 2500년 전에 시작되었으며 자부심과 문화의 축제로 간주됩니다. Jallikattu는 ��� 개의 타밀어 Jalli와 Kattu에서 파생됩니다. Jali는 동전을 의미하고 Kattu는 황소의 뿔이라고합니다. 실제로 이를 기념하는 또 다른 이유는 퐁갈 축제가 농작물 수확과 관련이 있고 농작물에 수소를 사용하는 일이 상당히 많아 보존의식을 갖도록 하기 위해 마련했다고 한다. 이 게임은 Maharashtra의 황소 카트 경주와 같은 많은 주에서 진행됩니다. 황소 사육자들은 이 스포츠로 인해 암소와 귀칼 3 기 7 화 암소의 비율이 주에서 균형을 유지했다고 말합니다. 그들은 이것이 금지되면 농부들이 이 황소들을 돌보지 않을 것이라고 말합니다. 이 지역 황소 품종은 종종 스포츠에 참여합니다. Sivagangai의 Pulikulam 마을에서 이러한 품종의 부족으로 인해 그들을 보호하기 위한 캠페인이 시작되었습니다. Jallikattu의 규칙입니다. Jallikattu를 플레이하기 위한 많은 규칙도 있습니다. 이를 위해 황소의 혹을 잡고 제어해야 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 합니다. 황소는 꼬리와 뿔을 잡고 잡아야 합니다. 황소는 고정된 시간 안에 통제를 받아야 하고 실패하면 패배한 것으로 간주됩니다.

사실, 몇 년 전 타밀 나두(Tamil Nadu)의 잘리카투(Jallikattu)에서 황소들이 경기 전에 술을 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 마시게 한 다음 몸부림쳤다고 주장하는 비디오가 나타났습니다. 이 때문에 의식도 없이 미친 듯이 달린다. 이 주장에 이어 인도 동물 복지 위원회와 동물을 윤리적으로 대우하는 사람들(PETA) 인도는 이 스포츠가 황소에게 잔인하다며 대법원에 탄원서를 제출했습니다. 2014년 5월 7일 대법원은 Jallikattu가 국내 어느 곳에서도 재생되어서는 안 된다며 금지했습니다. 이후 센터는 2016년 조례를 가져와 몇 가지 조건을 걸고 녹색 신호를 보냈다. 타밀 나두와 마하라슈트라 정부가 만든 법은 대법원에서 이의를 제기했고, 처음에는 법원에서 거부되었고 나중에 검토 청원을 듣기로 동의했습니다. 수년간의 청문회 끝에 법원은 마침내 오늘 다시 Jallikattu가 황소에 대한 위험이 없다고 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 계속해서 말하도록 허용했습니다.

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 버전 스트리밍 사이트

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 버전 무료 다운로드 링크

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 버전 블루레이

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 버전 2023 자막

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 버전 스트리밍 1080P 사이트

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 버전 특전

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 버전 무료 다운로드

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 만화책 극장판

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 1화 2화 3화 4화 5화 6화

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 전체 버전 온라인 상현집결 그리고 도공 마을로

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 전체 버전 2022 상현집결 그리고 도공 마을로

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 vod

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 온라인 스트리밍보기 넷플릭스 동영상

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 전체 버전 온라인 출연진

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 전체 버전 온라인 무료 보기

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 시계 온라인 다시 보기 vod

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 전체 버전 온라인 영화 애니메이션

HD로 귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 온라인 무료 시청 보기

HD로 귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 넷플릭스 웨이브

HD로 귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 링크

HD로 귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 쿠키 재방송 보는곳 바로가기

HD로 귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 소나기 누누

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 다운로드 링크

귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 다시보기 동영상 누누

뉴델리, JNN. 2023 칸 영화제: 2023 칸 영화제 개막은 매우 활기찼다. 이번 페스티벌은 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 11일간 진행되며 발리우드의 대스타들이 레드카펫 위에서 아름다운 자태를 뽐내고 있다.

지금까지 Sara Ali Khan에서 Esha Gupta, Urvashi Rautela, Sara Ali Khan과 같은 스타들이 레드 카펫 위를 걸었습니다. 이 외에도 Mrinal Thakur는 레드 카펫에서 그녀의 존재감을 느낄 것입니다. 그러나 Aishwarya Rai의 칸 영화제 레드카펫 룩이 기대됩니다. 보도가 사실이라면 그녀는 오늘 레드카펫을 밟을 귀칼 3 기 7 화 예정이다. 2023년 특별 의상을 살펴보기 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 전에 아이쉬와라의 예전 칸 영화제 룩을 살펴보자. 2002년 사리를 입고 걸었다. Aishwarya Rai는 Devdas의 초연으로 칸 영화제에 귀칼 3 기 7 화 데뷔했습니다. 그녀의 패션 게임은 해가 갈수록 더 높아졌습니다. 매년 여배우는 다른 모습으로 나타났습니다. 2002년에 그녀는 Neeta Lulla가 디자인한 황금 사리와 함께 무거운 주얼리를 착용했습니다. 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기그는 Shah Rukh Khan, Sanjay Leela Bhansali와 함께 레드카펫을 걸었습니다. 2003년, Aishwarya는 두 가지 다른 모습으로 레드카펫 위를 걷는 모습이 목격되었습니다. 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 Aishwarya Rai는 칸 영화제 심사위원 명단에 포함된 최초의 인도 여배우였습니다. 이번 페스티벌에서 그녀는 스트립 블라우스에 그린 사리를 입고 있었고, 두 번째 룩에서는 핑크색 레헨가콜리를 입고 있었다. 압사라가 하얀 가운을 입고 약혼했다. Aishwarya Rai Bachchan은 그녀의 외모로 팬들에게 감동을 주려고 할 때마다. 2004년 그녀는 깊게 파인 목 부분에 화이트 컬러의 반짝이는 드레스를 입고 미니멀한 주얼리를 착용했다. 그러나 처음 3년 동안 Aishwarya Rai는 그녀의 외모로 팬들에게 귀칼 3 기 7 화 깊은 인상을 주지 못했습니다. 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 2005년 그녀는 조르지오 아르마니가 디자인한 ���린트 화이트 가운을 입었고, 이 외에 검은색 투명 가운을 입고 등장했다. 2006년 미스 월드의 아이쉬와라야는 그녀의 외모로 사람들의 마음을 사로잡았다. Aishwarya Rai는 2006년 파란색 끈이 없는 가운을 입고 누드 메이크업을 하고 있었습니다. 칸 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 영화제에서 그녀의 이런 모습을 본 팬들은 열광했고, 팬들은 그녀를 칭찬하는 데 지치지 않았다. 이후 2007년 아비섹 밧찬과 결혼한 뒤 첫 레드카펫 데뷔 무대를 가졌다. 그녀는 흰색 끈이없는 가운과 다이아몬드 목걸이를 입고 살해했습니다. Aishwarya는 2008년에 세 가지 다른 모습으로 등장했습니다. Aishwarya Rai의 초기 룩은 단순했을지 모르지만 해가 갈수록 그녀의 룩은 팬들의 마음을 사로잡았습니다. 2008년에는 블랙, 핑크, 화이트 컬러의 드레스를 입고 세 가지 다른 룩으로 등장했다. 이런 그녀의 모습을 본 팬들은 계속 지켜봤다.

이 외에도 여배우는 2009년과 2010년에 다른 색상의 가운을 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 토렌트 3기 착용하여 패션 게임을 향상시켰습니다. 그녀의 외모 중 일부는 팬들의 마음에 들었지만 여배우는 반복적으로 흰색을 입어 트롤을 많이 당했습니다. Aishwarya Rai Bachchan은 이러한 외모 때문에 트롤되었습니다. Aishwarya Rai Bachchan의 칸 영화제 룩에 대해 이야기하자면, 2010년 그녀는 남편 Abhishek Bachchan과 함께 Sabyasachi의 Golden Saree를 걸었지만 딸 Aaradhya를 출산한 후 2012년 Aishwarya Rai Bachchan이 레드 카펫에서 블랙을 입었을 때. 가운, 여배우는 그녀의 체중 증가로 인해 많은 트롤링을 받았습니다. 2012년 이후 아이쉬와라 라이는 칸 영화제에서 최고의 룩을 선보이기 위해 많은 실험을 했지만 여배우의 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 완벽한 룩을 위해 보라색 립스틱을 바르기도 했고, 짙은 화장으로 전체적인 룩을 망쳐버리기도 했다. 지난해 아이쉬와라 라이의 모습은 이랬다. 2022년에도 아이쉬와라 라이 바찬은 외모로 모두의 마음을 사로잡았다. 그녀는 꽃무늬가 있는 검은색 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 가운을 입고 있었다.

이를 통해 그녀는 머리를 곧게 펴고 최소한의 장신구를 들고 다녔다. 이제 팬들은 올해 Aishwarya Rai 귀멸의 칼날 도공 마을편 7화 다시 보기 3기 자막 Bachchan의 모습을 간절히 기다리고 있습니다. 그녀는 화보 촬영을 위해 심플한 브라렛과 힙스터를 입고 여유로운 자신감을 드러냈다. 한 흑백 사진에서 Abbey는 한 팔을 머리 위로 올리면서 내밀었습니다. 스모키한 눈매와 반짝이는 립글로스를 흔들며 입술을 벌리며 카메라를 향해 섹시한 눈빛을 선사했다. 또 다른 사진에서 애비는 턱을 들어 올리고 한쪽 다리를 꼬고 앉았다.

Pete Wicks는 공중 화장실에서 축구 선수 Declan Rice와 어색한 충돌을 밝힙니다. 그녀는 로고 라인에서 머리를 흔들었습니다. Abbey의 모델링 경력은 2006년 영국의 Next Top Model에 참여하면서 시작되었습니다. 그녀는 Arena Magazine, Triumph Bonneville Motorbike, Sports Illustrated 등 많은 잡지 모델이 되었습니다. 한편, 이 모델은 최근 피터와의 관계와 자신이 기분이 좋다는 것을 그녀에게 알리는 ��법에 대해 공개했습니다. 전 미식축구 에이스(42)는 Abbey에게 3개의 이모티콘을 보내 자신의 생각을 알립니다. 비버와 가지 이모티콘을 그녀에게 보냅니다. Peter와 네 자녀를 공유하고 있는 이 모델은 팟캐스트인 The Therapy Crouch의 에피소드에서 부부가 종종 자신의 삶에 대해 이야기하면서 청취자에게 조언을 제공하는 동안 폭로를 했습니다.

44세의 이 남성은 공항에서 친구 패디와 헤어진 뒤 연락이 두절된 뒤 실종됐다. Margueritte는 다음과 같이 썼습니다. 우리는 그를 최대한 빨리 집으로 데려가는 것이 간절해서 그를 집으로 데려올 수 있도록 마음에서 손을 뻗어 이 글을 씁니다.” 그녀는 또한 최근에 그의 아내 Suki에게 논평을 했는데, 이는 그녀가 Nish가 그의 아내에 대해 가졌던 통제를 알고 있었음을 암시할 수 있습니다. Elaine이 말했습니다. "당신은 그렇게 오랫동안 침묵 속에 앉아 있었습니다. 여기에서 이 개발 스토리에 대한 업데이트를 정기적으로 확인하십시오. EastEnders 시청자는 캐릭터가 크리스마스에 살해될 것이라는 사실이 확인된 후 크리스마스에 누가 살인 사건으로 죽는지 안다고 생각합니다. 최근 한 에피소드에서 시청자는 이제 피해자가 분명해졌고 살인자도 밝혀졌을 수 있다고 확신하게 되었습니다.

Linda Carter의 어머니 Elaine Peacock이 도착한 후 그녀와 Nish Panesar 사이에 긴장된 장면이 있었습니다. Nish는 몇 주 동안 Panesars가 기회가 있다고 믿게 만들었음에도 귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 불구하고 대신 어머니와 사업을 시작하기로 결정했기 때문에 The Vic에 대한 그의 제안을 거부 한 Linda에게 분노했습니다. 최근 에피소드에서 Elaine과 Nish는 The Vic이 Elaine과 침입한 후 Nish가 배후에 있다고 확신한 후 어색한 시선과 의견을 공유했습니다. Emmerdale은 배우의 비밀 댓글 후 Moira를 구하기 위해 과거 캐릭터에 대해 '봉인'으로 반환합니다. EastEnders 시청자는 크리스마스에 누가 죽는지 안다고 생각합니다. 그의 여동생인 Margueritte Devine은 슬프게도 그녀의 오빠가 화요일 밤에 죽은 채 발견되었음을 확인했습니다. Robert를 집으로 데려오고 그의 장례식을 치르는 데 드는 비용을 귀멸의 칼날 도공마을편 7화 7회 충당하기 위해 GoFundMe 페이지가 개설되었습니다.

[hamslivenews]

A batch of petitions seeking the legalisation of same-sex marriage is currently being considered by the Supreme Court's five-judge Constitution Bench. The bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Dr Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, and comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli, and P S Narasimha, reserved its verdict on Thursday after hearing arguments from all sides over the course of ten days. The petitions relate to the legal recognition of same-sex marriage, with one petitioner highlighting the absence of a legal framework for members of the LGBTQIA+ community to marry the person of their choice. The Court has indicated that it will consider the matter under the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, rather than personal laws. The petitioners have asserted their fundamental right to marry, while their lawyers have argued that provisions of the Special Marriage Act should be interpreted expansively to include the LGBTQIA+ community. The respondents have argued that the legalisation of same-sex marriage could lead to the legalisation of incestuous and polyamorous relationships, but the petitioners have denied this.

[seemabhatnagar]

‘During Suspension Relationship of Master and Servant do not come to an end’

UP Singh v. Punjab National Bank

Civil Appeal 5494/2013

Before Supreme Court of India

14.12.2023 by Division Bench of Hon’ble Madam Justice Hima Kohli J & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal J

Background

The appellant-workman is challenging the order dt.10.02.2011 passed in letters patent appeal 481/2010 by Delhi High Court upholding the order passed by Single Judge of Delhi High Court in Writ Petition 7834/2003.

Facts

The workman was appointed with the Bank on 20.06.1977 as Clerk-cum-Cash at Barabnki.

Thereafter, he was transferred to Zaidpur, Barabanki and then to Shahjanhanpur in August 1978.

On 14.06.1982, he was suspended on account of his disorderly behaviour.

On enquiry, the workman was found guilty of the charges and awarded punishment of stoppage of two graded increments with cumulative effect vide order dated 28.09.1983.

Vide the same order, he was advised to report for duty to the Manager, Branch Office, Bhagwantnagar, Unnao.

The workman failed to join duty.

In terms of Clause XVI9 of the Bipartite Agreement (voluntaryfor duty at Bhagwatnagar Unnao. cessation of the agreement) between Indian Banks’ Association and Workmen Unions, vide order dated 05.12.1984, the workman was deemed to have voluntarily retired from service.

Aggrieved by the order dt.05.12.1984 the workman raised industrial dispute before Assistant Labour Commissioner, six year thereafter. As conciliation failed between the workman and the Bank the dispute was referred to arbitrator for adjudication.

CGIT passed award in favor of the workman on 27.08.2003.

Single Judge reversed the award and in LPA Division Bench upheld the order of Single Judge.

Submission of the Appellant

The Disciplinary Authority, while passing the order of punishment after enquiry, could not have ordered his transfer in the same order as the competence to order transfer of the workman lied with a different authority. He was deemed to have been voluntarily retired.

He was not given joining time also.

He made number of representations to revoke his suspension to enable him to join the place of posting after his reinstatement.

He had even gone on hunger strike but none of the authorities redressed his grievance.

He was not even paid subsistence allowance for the period he was under suspension.

After passing of the punishment order in the enquiry initiated against him, he could not be continued on suspension as the order dated 28.09.1983 stated that he shall be deemed to be reinstated only on joining at the new place of posting.

His reason for not complying with the order of transfer was that the Branch Office, Bhagwantnagar, Unnao, was at a distance of 350 kilometers.

There was non-payment of allowances including subsistence allowance for the previous period, and if he was stated to be under suspension, he could not have been transferred as the transfer was possible only after his reinstatement.

Submission of the Bank

Seeing the conduct of the workman, who had been misbehaving with his senior officers and was also in the habit of not complying with the orders of the authorities, he was imposed a very light punishment of stoppage of two graded increments, otherwise the notice issued to him after enquiry was to show cause as to why he should not be dismissed from service.

There is no place for any in disciplined person in any institution, especially in a Bank where entire business depends upon the dealing of the staff with its customers.

Even after the punishment was imposed upon him and to avoid any further untoward incident, seeing his past conduct, the workman was directed to report for duty at a different branch.

However, the workman did not comply with that order and continued raising the dispute with the Bank at different levels.

He further mis-conducted himself by sitting on a hunger strike.

This aggravated the issue and shows the attitude of the workman who was not fit to be retained in service. It was contended that there is no error in the orders passed by the High Court setting aside the award of the Tribunal and the workman does not deserve any relief.

Observation of the Supreme Court

As per the material available on record the workman-appellant after his deemed retirement joined active practice as lawyer.

A fact which is not in dispute and has been specifically recorded by the Single Judge of the High Court in his order is that in the year 1985 the workman got himself enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh.

It was admitted by workman that he had been handling cases of the Union and other employees of the Bank.

The workman never challenged the order dt. 28.09.83 of punishment or his transfer before the competent authority or the Court and the said order attained finality.

Instead of joining his new place of posting, he continued writing letters.

In terms of Clause XVI of the Bipartite Agreement, in case a workman absents from work consecutively for 90 days or more, without submitting any application for leave, the Bank is entitled, after 30 days’ notice, to conclude that the employee has no intention to join duty and is deemed to have voluntarily retired on expiry of the notice period of 30 days.

A person aggrieved by the order of transfer cannot sit at home and decide on his own that the order is illegal or erroneous and he will not comply with the same.

The workman was several times given opportunity and time to report at his place of posting.

The workman instead of joining continued making correspondences one after the other with the bank authorities claiming his unpaid subsistence allowance for the period of suspension and very cleverly avoided mentioning his address in all his correspondences.

The action was taken by the Bank only to ensure that somehow or the other, the workman joined his duty.

However, it seems that the workman had some other scheme in his mind.

The idea seems to be to lay a claim on all his wages. Initially, to get subsistence allowance without working and then claim reinstatement and back wages.

If Clause XVI in the Bipartite Agreement is seen, the workman could have been treated to have been voluntarily retired immediately upon expiry of 90 days from 28.09.1983 as he had failed to join duty.

Letter dated 05.01.1984 issued by the Bank was duly acknowledged by him in his communication but still he failed to join duty and continued writing letters.

 Despite this fact, the Bank was magnanimous enough to have issued a final notice to the workman on 05.10.1984, granting him 30 days’ time to report for duty. This is also acknowledged by the workman. But for reasons best known to him he failed to comply with the same.

His over-smartness is evident further from the contents of his letter where he claimed that as a consequence of non-payment of subsistence allowance, he had to pass his life on open road and his address for communication had been lost, thus making sure that he could take a plea that none of the communications from the Bank were received by him.

He wrote letter to the Chairman of the Bank informing that he had gone on hunger strike from 06.03.1984 onwards on account of non-redressal of his grievances. Yet, he was smart enough not to furnish his address in the said letter.

Notice was also published in Lucknow and Allahabad Editions of North India Patrika on 08.10.1984. This was done as an abundant caution as the workman had not been furnishing his address in any of his communication though had been corresponding with the Bank.

The conduct of the workman itself was sufficient to non-suit him as has rightly been done.

His argument that being on suspension, he could not have been treated to have been voluntarily retired as per the deeming provision, is merely to be noticed and rejected, as during his suspension also, the relationship of master and servant does not come to an end.

All the rules and regulations governing the post continue to apply.

 Merely because the Bank had stopped paying subsistence allowance to the workman does not mean that the workman was no more an employee of the Bank.

Order

We do not find any error with the order passed by the Delhi High Court. The same is upheld.

Seema Bhatnagar